Article

Bootcamp to CTO: The Hidden Link Between Hiring and Retention

15 minutes

The path into a tech career has changed. More developers are starting in bootcamps, apprenticeships, or mid-career switches. These candidates bring strong potential and real technical skills. But too often, they’re hired into roles with no clear route forward.

This creates a growing challenge for businesses across financial services, pharmaceuticals, retail, and the public sector. Without structure, early-career hires leave. Internal mobility stalls. And teams end up rehiring for the same roles again and again.

In this guide, we look at how progression and retention are shaped at the point of hire. We explore what entry-level developers need from their first role, where companies fall short, and what hiring strategies can help build long-term capability in your tech team.

The Changing Pathways Into Tech Careers

Today’s developers are entering the industry in new ways. While degrees and graduate schemes still play a role, a growing number of candidates are coming through coding bootcamps, apprenticeships, and retraining programmes.

This is already shaping hiring in sectors like financial services, pharmaceuticals, and the public sector. In 2023, more than 330,000 apprenticeships started in England. Nearly half were aged over 25. The government’s digital bootcamps aim to train over 60,000 people in areas like software engineering, cloud infrastructure, and data analytics by 2025.

These candidates are entering junior developer roles, support engineering positions, and early-stage data roles. They often arrive with experience in:

  • Full stack JavaScript, Python, or Java
  • Frontend frameworks like React or Angular
  • Version control tools such as Git
  • Cloud platforms including AWS and Azure
  • SQL and basic database management
  • Agile project delivery

While the technical foundations are strong, many still need a clear structure and a route to progress. That needs to be considered at the hiring stage.

Roles aimed at junior or entry-level developers should be scoped with onboarding, support, and progression in mind. If not, these hires leave early. That leads to stalled projects, repeat recruitment, and missed internal mobility.

In high-pressure teams, it’s easy to hire for output and try to backfill development later. But in reality, the first six months shape retention. That’s where hiring needs to change.

How Job Structure Impacts Progression and Retention

Progression issues rarely start six months into a role. They often start on day one, with how that role is structured. If a developer is brought in to deliver against short-term outputs with no visibility on what comes next, they will not stay. Many organisations assume that internal mobility and long-term engagement can be handled later. In practice, the first six months define whether a hire grows with the team or becomes a flight risk.

Hiring without a defined structure creates confusion. When expectations and development paths are unclear, performance stalls, engagement drops, and teams enter a cycle of repeat hiring. This is one of the most common challenges facing businesses in financial services, pharmaceuticals, and the public sector, particularly where junior developer roles, support engineers, and entry-level data analysts are being hired into high-pressure environments.

Here are five ways job structure influences long-term success:

  • No framework, no progression: If a role is delivered with only tactical tasks and no roadmap, new hires struggle to see how their work leads to more senior opportunities.
  • Project exposure defines potential: Developers who work only on maintenance or low-impact features miss out on the experience needed for mid-level or team lead positions.
  • Mentorship matters: Without access to more experienced engineers or regular feedback, learning slows and confidence drops.
  • Flat structures can stall mobility: In small teams, progression is often informal and undefined, leaving junior hires unsure how to advance.
  • Undefined expectations lead to mismatched retention: A role may be advertised as growth-focused but scoped around repetitive output, creating misalignment and early attrition.

These patterns are particularly visible in fast-scaling industries. In pharmaceuticals, junior developers are often hired to support data migration or clinical platform builds, but have limited access to broader product work. 

In financial services, analysts enter through change or transformation teams but lack a route into technical leadership or architecture. In the public sector, short-term delivery roles can limit cross-functional learning, making it harder to build long-term digital capability.

Progression Is Key to Building Strong Tech Teams

It’s true that people are entering tech through more routes than they were even five years ago. Apprenticeships, coding bootcamps, and mid-career switches are all opening the door to digital careers. And as the fastest-growing sectors become increasingly tech-led, those opportunities are only expanding.

However, tech talent shortages and the speed of change across development, cloud, and data mean that structured progression is essential. It matters not just for the health of your tech team, but for the future of the wider industry. Without progression, early-career hires struggle to move forward, and capability gaps grow across the sector.

How progression supports sustainable tech recruitment

Progression is more than a retention tool. It builds the long-term technical strength your organisation depends on. When roles are scoped with clear expectations, project variety, and growth built in, delivery improves. Teams become more capable, more consistent, and less reliant on short-term fixes.

This is especially relevant in junior developer roles, data analyst opportunities, and infrastructure or support functions. A well-structured role helps early-career hires grow into confident contributors, rather than stalling or leaving too soon.

Effective recruitment and retention strategies must start here, not after the fact.

Why early-career growth matters to the broader tech industry

The UK needs more trained, experienced developers. That pipeline is now shaped heavily by alternative pathways — bootcamps, apprenticeships, and self-directed learning. If employers only hire for finished skillsets and neglect training, the entire system slows down.

A lack of progression at junior levels means fewer candidates reaching senior roles. That affects the availability of future software developer jobs UK, cloud architect jobs, and experienced data professionals. The result is slower hiring, rising costs, and stalled innovation.

By supporting progression in-house, you reduce external dependency, retain hard-to-find skills, and contribute to a healthier tech workforce overall.

DEI Goals are Undermined When Progression is Unclear

The shift towards more inclusive entry routes is one of the most positive changes in tech recruitment. Apprenticeships, bootcamps, and career-switching programmes have opened the door to people who were historically underrepresented in the industry, including women, people from lower-income backgrounds, and those without degrees.

These routes are helping employers access broader talent, improve representation, and meet ongoing demand across development, data, and engineering. But without progression, this progress is short-lived.

The link between progression and long-term inclusion

Many of these candidates enter tech in junior roles. If those roles are scoped only for delivery, with no clear path forward, people leave or stay without advancing. That is where inclusion fails.

Progression problems do not affect all groups equally. Those entering from non-traditional routes often have less access to informal support, internal networks, or prior industry knowledge. If progression is undefined, it favours those who already know how to navigate it. That leads to uneven retention, fewer promotions, and fewer diverse candidates reaching mid or senior-level positions.

  • Just 29% of tech workers in the UK are women
  • Only 20% of software engineering roles are held by women or non-binary people
  • One in three women in tech plan to leave due to a lack of career development support (Source: Tech Talent Charter, Computer Weekly)

This is not just about representation. It affects long-term capability. If the only people who progress are those from already well-represented groups, the industry loses out on the diversity it needs to solve complex problems, reach new audiences, and build stronger products.

What to prioritise

To ensure hiring efforts lead to meaningful, long-term inclusion, progression needs to be factored into role design at the start.

  • Define clear development pathways for junior roles
  • Provide access to high-impact work, not only support tasks
  • Offer structured mentorship, especially for those entering through new routes
  • Set consistent, transparent progression criteria across the team

Supporting junior developers from all backgrounds to advance is one of the most effective ways to close equity gaps and retain critical talent. Without it, even the best DEI intentions fall short.

Why Long-Term Retention Starts With the Hiring Process

This guide has explored how developers are entering tech through new routes, what early-career hires need to progress, and how capability is shaped by the roles people are hired into. At the centre of all of this is one key point: long-term retention is driven by hiring decisions, not just team culture or performance management.

We see these issues most often where roles are designed to meet short-term delivery needs, but lack the structure to support long-term development. These aren’t the result of poor hiring decisions or weak pipelines. They happen when progression is not considered part of the hiring process. When that step is missed, early-career hires disengage, internal mobility slows, and capability gaps widen over time.

This is especially common in:

  • Junior developers brought in for delivery, with no clear path into core product work
  • Analysts supporting transformation teams, but blocked from growing into strategic roles
  • Platform engineers handling support tasks, with limited scope for ownership or advancement
  • Teams growing quickly, but with no structure to support movement between levels

These challenges don’t resolve themselves later. They are built into the role from the start.

Time to Rethink How You're Building Tech Teams? 

Your hiring process shapes your retention outcomes. Businesses with structured, progression-based recruitment frameworks outperform those with reactive hiring strategies, both in employee satisfaction and team performance.

If you’re unsure whether your hiring approach aligns with your business goals, now is the time to reflect. Where are your junior hires today? Are they staying and growing with your team, or are turnover rates climbing? 

Progression starts at the point of hire. By investing in structured support, mentorship, and clear career pathways, your business can build teams that evolve, innovate, and succeed over the long term.

Get Expert Support for Building Strong Tech Teams 

At McGregor Boyall, we understand the complexities of recruitment in the tech industry. From crafting progression-friendly roles to sourcing leading talent, we’re here to help. Whether you’re scaling a startup or fulfilling critical enterprise-level roles, we’ll connect you with hires who grow alongside your organisation. 

Contact us today to discuss how our expertise can support your team’s success.